3 Evidence Factors That Impact Court Proceedings

3 Evidence Factors That Impact Court Proceedings

Evidence plays a crucial role in court proceedings. Evidence can be documents, photographs, or physical objects that help prove an individual’s guilt or innocence. The best way for defendants to ensure their chances at acquittal is by hiring a good lawyer right away if they’re being accused of committing any crimes. Best defense attorney in Philadelphia can provide you with more information on this topic.

Three factors come into play when it comes to court proceedings: relevance, materiality, and weight of the evidence given by witnesses during trial proceedings.

1) Relevance:

Evidence must be relevant to the case at hand. For example, a video recording of an individual committing a crime is considered admissible evidence.

Inadmissible: A photo from someone’s Instagram that shows them standing next to another person who committed the crime would not be considered admissible evidence because it has nothing to do with what happened during court proceedings.

Evidence examples: For evidence to be deemed as “relevant” and thus allowed in trial hearings, lawyers will need proof or witness testimony suggesting relevance. This can include but isn’t limited to photographs taken by eyewitnesses, surveillance footage, restricted phone calls between defendants and their co-defendants made while they were incarcerated together etc.

2) Materiality:

Material evidence is any kind of proof that can be used to prove or disprove criminal accusations. Materiality includes but isn’t limited to photographs taken by eyewitnesses, surveillance footage etc.

Inadmissible: Immaterial evidence cannot be used during trial proceedings. For example, a defendant’s alibi statement would not count as material evidence because it doesn’t prove or disprove any criminal accusations and thus can’t be used to change the outcome of court hearings.

For example, surveillance footage from a store robbery can help determine if an individual was involved in the crime and thus capable of committing it.

Relevance must also apply when it comes down to deciding whether certain evidence is material or immaterial.

3) Weight of the evidence:

It’s important to keep in mind that the judge and jury might not always listen or believe everything a witness has to say, especially if their testimony seems unreliable.

For example, if a witness has given conflicting testimonies in the past (multiple versions of their account of what happened), this might make them seem unreliable and thus not as credible.

Inadmissible: This can also be used to determine materiality regarding evidence because certain pieces of evidence will be deemed “unreliable” or less valuable than others depending on who is testifying about it.

Conclusion:

Evidence can be used to prove or disprove criminal accusations. The best way for defendants to ensure their chances at acquittal is by hiring a good lawyer right away if they’re being accused of committing any crimes. Top criminal lawyers in Philadelphia can provide you with more information on this topic .